SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 97

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Bhagwati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jameela Begam – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Gupta for applicant; Sunil Jain for respondents.

ORDER (Oral)

1. The appellant/plaintiff has filed this revision under section 115 of CPC being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 23.1.2006 passed by 8th Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Appeal No. 1B/2006 affirming the judgment and decree dated 18.7.2005 passed by 8th Civil Judge, Class-I, Gwalior whereby his suit filed against predecessor in title of the respondent namely Munna Khan for recovery of Rs. 10,000/- was dismissed.

2. The facts giving rise to this revision in short are that the applicant herein filed the impugned suit against the predecessor of the respondent namely munna Khan the proprietor of M/s Kishan Rehat Industries for recovery of Rs. 10,000/-. As per futher averments such sum was arrears against Munna Khan, on 17.3.1991 by accepting the liability to pay such sum Munna Khan had executed promissory note of Rs. 10,000/- in favour of the appellant with assurance to pay such sum along with interest @ 1.75% per month within 120 days i.e. four months and later sum of Rs. 1,050/- as interest was paid by the deceased Munna Khan to the applicant on 17.7.1991 and when remaining sum was not paid by Munna to the appellant then the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top