SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 20

R.S.JHA
K. P. Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Tulsidas – Respondent


Advocates:
eq[rkj vgen vihykFkhZ dh vksj lsA
Mukhtar Ahmed for appellant.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Shri Mukhtar Ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant on the question of admission and interim relief.

2. The appellant has filed this appeal being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 6.9.2010, passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Katni in C.A. No. 50-0A/08, whereby the judgment and decree of the Fourth Civil Judge Class I, Katni dated 24.10.2008 passed in C.S. No. 14-A06 has been set aside and reversed.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant purchased a part of Khasra No. 124, village Barhi, Tahsil Katni, District Jabalpur (now district Katni) by registered sale deed dated 16.3.1982 from father of respondent No. 1, however, by mistake or oversight, Khasra Nos. 130/1, 131 were mentioned in the sale deed. It is stated that respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6 also purchased a part of the aforesaid Khasra numbers from the father of respondent No. 1 and similar mistakes were also committed in the sale deeds executed in their favour. On discovering the said mistake, the appellant filed an application before the Naib Tahsildar, Barhi, who by order dated 14.5.1993 permitted changes in the sale deed. It is stated that the f






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top