SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 451

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Aneeta Rajpoot – Appellant
Versus
Saraswati Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Amitab Gupta for petitioner;
Amod Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging that part of the impugned order dated 27.6.2012 by which the defendant’s (petitioner’s) application under section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short “Evidence Act”) has been rejected.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of this petition lie in a narrow compass. Suffice it to say that a suit for eviction on the relationship of landlord and tenant has been filed by plaintiff-respondent against defendant-petitioner. The defendant-petitioner submitted written statement and also filed counter claim praying a decree of mandatory injunction directing plaintiff to execute a registered sale-deed in her favour; perpetual injunction restraining the plaintiff from interfering with the possession of the defendant and also from transferring, encumbering and creating any third party right; declaration that suit property be charged in respect of consideration money paid by the defendant in advance; and any other reliefs which the Court deems fit. According to pleadings of counter claim earlier the parties were having very cordial and sweet relationship as a result of which they entered

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top