A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Aneeta Rajpoot – Appellant
Versus
Saraswati Gupta – Respondent
1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging that part of the impugned order dated 27.6.2012 by which the defendant’s (petitioner’s) application under section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short “Evidence Act”) has been rejected.
2. The facts necessary for disposal of this petition lie in a narrow compass. Suffice it to say that a suit for eviction on the relationship of landlord and tenant has been filed by plaintiff-respondent against defendant-petitioner. The defendant-petitioner submitted written statement and also filed counter claim praying a decree of mandatory injunction directing plaintiff to execute a registered sale-deed in her favour; perpetual injunction restraining the plaintiff from interfering with the possession of the defendant and also from transferring, encumbering and creating any third party right; declaration that suit property be charged in respect of consideration money paid by the defendant in advance; and any other reliefs which the Court deems fit. According to pleadings of counter claim earlier the parties were having very cordial and sweet relationship as a result of which they entered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.