SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 395

SUJOY PAUL
Dhanwanti – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Gaurav Samadhiya for petitioner;
Mrs. Sangeeta Pachauri, Deputy Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 4.7.2012 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Dabra under section 40 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (Adhiniyam).

2. Shri Gaurav Samadhiya, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the impugned order is an appealable order but since the order is without jurisdiction, he has chosen to file this writ petition directly before this Court. The learned counsel submits that a complaint was filed against the petitioner on 4.9.2011 and on the strength of which a show cause notice was issued on 6.2.2012. This show cause notice was issued under secttion 40 of the Adhiniyam. The petitioner submitted his reply on 6.3.2012. Thereafter, the impugned order is passed on 4.7.2012. The learned counsel heavily relied on proviso to section 40(1)(c) which reads as under :

“40. Removal of office bearers of Panchayat. -- (1) The State Government or the prescribed authority may after such enquiry as it may deem fit to make at any time, remove an office bearer --

(a)

(b)

(c)

[Provided further that the final order in the inquiry shall be passed within 90






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top