Shivdayal
Nagendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaidev Satpathy – Respondent
1. This revision arises from an order passed by the trial Court holding that the State of Madhya Pradesh is a necessary party to the suit and directing the plaintiff to join the State Government as a party. Aggrieved by that order, the plaintiff has come up in revision.
2. To state briefly, the plaintiffs case is that the Phuljhar Sewa Samiti, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, is in occupation of the suit accommodation as tenant on Rs. 150/- per month. A total sum of Rs. 11,500/- was received by the plaintiff. The defendant tenant is in arrears of rent to the extent of Rs. 5,400/-. The plaintiff claims a decree for ejectment and for arrears of rent.
3. It also stated in the plaint that at the time that the suit accommodation was given on lease to the defendant-society, it was agreed that in case the society paid Rs. 16,000/- in all to the plaintiff within three years of the defendant's entering into possession of the suit accommodation the plaintiff-would execute a deed of sale in respect of it, in favour of the society. However, the society paid only Rs. 11,500- not the entire sum of Rs. 16,000/-. The amount thus receive was adjusted towards rent.
4. Res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.