Newaskar, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the decision of Tare J., in Misc. Appeal No. 106 of 1962 preferred by the appellant Gokuldas s/o Balkishan Mahajan of Amjhera and another against the decision of the Additional District Judge Dhar in Civil Suit No. 3 of 1953 refusing, to set aside the order recording a compromise in a suit filed after securing the consent of the Advocate General by the appellants under Section 92 C.P.C. for the removal of defendant Nandlal and his son Gokuldas from the temple and its properties of Goverdhannathji at Amjhera from the position of Nandlal as a Pujari appointed by the members of the Nima Mahajan and other Vaishnavaites of Amjhera and for appointment of another suitable person in his place of look after the worship of the deity and to manage the temple properties and for preparing a scheme for the afore-said purpose. It was alleged in the plaint that the said Nandlal was not earring out his duties regarding worship of the deity and management of the property properly and had begun laying personal claim to the temple and its properties. The plaintiffs alleged that the properties set out in the list attached to the plaint had been ded