SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(MP) 99

C.Kondaiah, G.L.Oza
Anusayabai – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.G. Waghmare for appellant; S.G. Gokhle for respondents.

JUDGMENT

Kondaiah, J.

This appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Dewas, decreeing the civil suit No. 134-A of 1974 instituted by the respondents for partition and possession of their half share in the plaint Schedule movable and immovable properties and for mesne profits.

2. In order to understand the scope of the appeal and the respective contentions of the parties it is necessary to state the material fact that led to this appeal. One Harlal, a Hindu brahmin, resident of Malagaon village, Tahsil Khategaon in the district of Dewas died in the year 1920 leaving behind him his widow Bhagirathibai, son Balmukund and daughter Gajribai and considerable movable and immovable properties. The daughter Gajribai who was married died in 1931 leaving behind her sons - Jagdishprasad, Gangaprasad and Jamnaprasad, the respondents herein. Balmukund, the son of Harlal died on 19-2-1966 leaving behind him the plaint Schedule properties and Anusayabai, the daughter of Ganpatibai, the predeceased daughter of Balmukund and his mother Bhagirathibai Bhagirathibai also died on 2-3-1966.

3. On 6-10-971, the present suit for partition of the pla













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top