K.K.DUBE
Dashrath – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
K.K. DUBE, J.
1. The applicants seek to challenge the order canceling their bail by the Magistrate.
2. The facts briefly stated leading to this application are these:–
The applicants were arrested by the police pending investigation of offences punishable under section 394, 397 and 363 of the Indian Penal Code. The challan could not be filed within a period of sixty days of their arrest and the Sessions Judge granted bail under the proviso to section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Later, the charge-sheets were filed alleging commission of offences under sections 394, 397 and 363 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate committed the case for trial to the Court of Session as, in his opinion, the evidence taken by the investigating agency disclosed prima facie that the applicants have committed offences which were punishable by life imprisonment and were exclusively triable by the Court of Session. He also cancelled the bail granted earlier. The applicants then moved the Court or Sessions, Rewa but without any success. Hence this application.
3. It is contended that when under section 167(2) bails was granted, it would be deemed to be under Chapter XXXIII of the C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.