H.G.Mishra
Sardar Mal – Appellant
Versus
Shri 1008 Shri Chandra Prabhu Jinalaya Trustee, Sironj – Respondent
H.G. Mishra. J.- 1. This is defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree dated 8-9-72, whereby decree for ejectment granted by the trial Court by its judgment dated 22-7-69, have been confirmed.
2. Facts essential for purposes of this appeal are as under:-
(i) That the plaintiff/respondent Mandir Murti Chandra Prabhu Jinalaya, through Motital son of Hiralal Jain, so called manager instituted a suit for ejectment of defendant/appellant from the suit accommodation and mesne profits. The defendant is a tenant vide rent note Ex P/2 executed on Falgun Vadi 15, Samvat 2015 (dated 9-3-59) at the rate of Rs. 10 per month. This rent note is executed by the defendant/appellant in favour of members of managing committee namely (1) Motilal (2) Lakhmichand (3) Komalchand (4) Sardarmal Thekedar and (5) Mangilal. This rent note was for a term of one year:
The plaintiff further averred that the defendant has paid rent up to Fagun Vadi 14, Samvat 2016. Accordingly, rent is due from Fagun Vadi 15 Samvat 2016. Demand cum-quit notice was served by Motilal son of Hiralal Jain, describing himself as Prabhandak (Manager) of Shri 1008 Chandra Prabhu Jinalaya, Kadhali Bazar, Sironj on Magh Vadi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.