SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(MP) 40

T.P.Naik, S.P.Bhargava
Budhoolal – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Public Trust – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Pandey for petitioner; D.S. Muley for respondent No. 3.

ORDER

Naik J.

The only question that arises for consideration in this miscellaneous petition is whether the Additional Commissioner, Jabalpur (respondent No. 2) could be held to be the Registrar of public Trusts within the meaning of section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2. The petitioners claim to be working as sarbarakars of the temple 'Shri Radhakrishna and Bhagwan Viswakarma', Niwadganj, Jabalpur. They allege that after the coming into force of the Act, respondent No. 3, Kashiram Viswakarma, made an application for registration of the aforesaid trust under section 4 of the Act to the registrar of public Trusts, Jabalpur, where Shri V.S. Tambey, Additional Deputy Commissioner, Jabalpur, purporting to act as the Registrar of Public Trusts; Jubalpur, passed the impugned order (Annexure A) on 12-3-1955, in Revenue Cace (No. 47/125 of 1954-55, side head XXXIII /9, ordering the Registration of Shri Radhakrishna Bhagwan temple as a public trust with the direction that, Kashiram, respondent No. 3, be recorded as the sole trustee of the said trust in addition to the other entries made in the Register of the Registrar. The petitioner













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top