SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(MP) 10

P.V.DIXIT, S.P.BHARGAVA
Sojharmal – Appellant
Versus
Mun. Council, Kharsia – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. Razak and C. K. Sharma for petitioner
Y.S. Dharmadhikari and M.V. Tamaskar for respondent

ORDER

Dixit C.J.- 1. By this application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner Sojharmal who was the Vice-President of the Municipal Council, Kharsia, Raigarh District, seeks a writ of certiorari for quashing a resolution of no-confidence which was passed against him at a meeting of the Municipal Council held on 5th November 1963.

2. Before the commencement of the meeting, the petitioner made a proposal to the President that voting on the no-confidence motion should be 'free" and not by ballot. One Councillor, Mahavirprasad, moved a counterproposal. Ultimately, the President decided that voting on the motion would be by ballot. It is not disputed by the opponents that voting on the resolution was by ballot. As a result of the count it was found that twelve Councillors voted for the motion of no confidence against the petitioner and five against it. The Council consists of eighteen members and seventeen of them were present at the meeting at which the motion of no-confidence was moved. Under section 47 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), if a motion of no-confidence is carried by a majority of two-thirds of































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top