P.V.Dixit, K.L.Pandey, P.K.Tare
Laxminarayan – Appellant
Versus
Shivnarayan – Respondent
( Date 3-3-1965 )
Tare, J.
1. This revision under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code is by the plaintiffs against the order, dated, 27-10-1964, passed by Shri R. C. Jain, First Civil Judge Class II, Indore, in civil suit No. 12-A of 1963, directing the plaintiffs not only to specify the valuation of the plot of land, but also the valuation of the superstructure, which the petitioners do not claim as their own and which they want to be demolished, after which they seek possession of vacant plot of land. The defendant raised an objection about valuation with reference to Court-fees and jurisdiction.
2. The learned judge of the trial Court ordered the plaintiffs to state the ad valo em valuation of the plot, as also the super-structure standing thereon, both for the purposes of Court-fees and jurisdiction relying on the observations of my brother, Sen, J. in Nilkanth Vs. Laxman 1965 JLJ-SN 52. Hence the present revision.
3. It is to be noted that the plaintiffs claimed possession of a plot of land, which only forms a portion of land revenue paying estate. The trial judge, in my opinion, was right in directing the plaintiffs to state the market value of the plot as r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.