T.C.SHRIVASTAVA, G.P.SINGH
Piarelal – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwati Prasad – Respondent
T.C. SHRIVASTAVA, J.
1. This judgment governs the disposal of twelve Letters Patent Appeals No. 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of 1963 which have all been filed against the order of Shivdayal, J., allowing the several appeals filed by the respondents.
2. In order to appreciate the points raised in support of the appeals, it is necessary to state the facts in some detail. Chaturbhuj and Sewaram executed two simple mortgage deeds on 4.9.1924 and 30.6.1927 ill favour of Pyarelal, Ramlal and Motilal mortgaging their proprietary rights in village Jerwans along with the home farm (Sir and Khudkasht) lands. In the second mortgage bond, they had agreed to the condition that they would not lease out the home-farm lands. In spite of this agreement; they leased out the Khudkasht lands to several persons. The mortgages and mortgagees have been succeeded by their legal representatives but it is not necessary to give details. We shall refer to the mortgagees a, creditors, the mortgagors as principal judgment-debtors and the lessees as lessee-judgment-debtors.
3. The creditors instituted Civil Suit No. 5-A of 1943 in the Court of Additional District Judge, Sagar, on the basi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.