SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(MP) 113

G.P.Singh
Ramakant – Appellant
Versus
Devilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Y.S. Dharmadhikari for appellant;
P.C. Khare for respondent No.1, None for respondent No.2.

JUDGMENT

Singh, J. - 1. This second appeal is by defendant No. 1 who is the Proprietor and Editor of a daily Hindi Newspaper 'Inquilab' printed and published from Chhindwara. In the issue of this paper of 25th February 1961, the following news was published:-

^^dkaxzsl pquko esa Hkh ?kwl[kksjh 5500 :Œ [kpZ gq,A fNanokM+k fnŒ 22 Qjojh-

tkudkj lw=ksa ls irk pyk gS fd gky gh esa tks fNanokM+k ftyk dkaxzsl desVh ds v/;{k dk pquko gqvk gS] mlesa fot;h mEehnokj dh vksj ls fofHkUu e.Mys’ojksa dk oksV izkIr djus ds fy, 5500 :Œ [kpZ fd;k x;k gSA**


The plaintiff (respondent No. 1) is a member of the Indian National Congress and was elected as President of the District Congress Committee in the year 1961. His case was that the news quoted above related to him and was defamatory. He, therefore, claimed a sum of Rs.5,000 as damages for the libel. The trial Court decreed the suit for a sum of Rs. 500 and this decree has been upheld in first appeal.

2. Shri Y. S. Dharmadhikari, the learned counsel for the appellant, has raised before me the following three contentions:

(i) the news as published on its proper construction is not defamatory.

(ii) the plaintiff should have pleaded an innuendo, and

(iii) the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top