SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 24

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
S.K. Gangele and G.D. Saxena, JJ.
Sanjay Gupta v. State of M.P. and others
Writ Petition No.312 of 2013 (Gwalior); Decided on 8.1.2014.

Advocates:
V.K. Bharadwaj with Anvesh Jain for petitioner;
M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2/State;
Rajmani Bansal for respondent No.3;
Jitendra Sharma and Prashant Sharma for respondent No.4-Society;
Ms. Sudha Shrivastava for interveners students;
Raju Sharma for intervener staff;
Ashok Kumar Jain for objector.

Headnote:(1) Constitution of India -- Arts.226 and 21 -- writ petition as public interest litigation by teacher -- maintainability of -- J.C. Mills Education Institutions Managing Society -- complaint against society about irregularities, mismanagement and misappropriation of fund -- found proved -- no action taken by authorities -- future of students would be affected if proper steps are not taken -- receive of education -- is part and parcel of Article 21 -- public interest litigation is maintainable -- Administrator appointed. (2010)3 SCC 402 followed. [Paras 11, 12 & 16

       (2) Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 (M.P.) -- S.5(2) -- Government aided education society under provisions of Act -- complaint against society about irregularities, mismanagement and misappropriation of fund -- found proved -- no action taken by authorities -- if no action taken -- future of students would be affected -- Administrator appointed by High Court -- it was also directed to make enquiry about complaints. [Paras 11 to 16

       (3) Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.) -- Ss.32 and 33 -- scope of -- complaint against education society about irregularities mismanagement and misappropriationof fund -- Registrar is authorised to hold enquiry -- no action taken by authorities -- Administrator appointed by High Court. [Paras 13 to 16

       ¼1½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq-226 rFkk 21 && f’k{kd }kjk yksdfgr eqdnek ds :i esa fjV ;kfpdk && dk pykus ;ksX; gksuk && ts-lh- fey f’k{k.k laLFkk izca/k lfefr &7 lfefr ds fo:) vfu;ferrk,¡] dqizca/k rFkk fuf/k ds nqfoZfu;ksx dh f’kdk;r && lkfcr ikbZ xbZ && izkf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ && ;fn leqfpr dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkrh gS rc fo|kfFkZ;ksa dk Hkfo”; izHkkfor gksxk && f’k{kk izkIr djuk && vuqPNsn 21 dk vfuok;Z vax gS && iz’kkld fu;qDr fd;k x;kA ¼2010½3 ,l lh lh 402 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 11] 12 ,oa 16½

       ¼2½ v’kkldh; f’k{k.k laLFkk ¼v/;kidksa rFkk deZpkfj;ksa ds osruksa dk lank;½ vf/kfu;e] 1978 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 5¼2½ && vf/kfu;e ds mica/kksa ds varxZr ljdkj ls lgk;rk izkIr f’k{kk lfefr && lfefr ds fo:) vfu;ferrk,¡] dqizca/k rFkk fuf/k ds nqfoZfu;ksx ds fo”k; esa f’kdk;r && lkfcr ikbZ xbZ && izkf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ && ;fn dk;Zokgh ugha dh tkrh gS && fo|kfFkZ;ksa dk Hkfo”; izHkkfor gksxk && mPp U;k;ky; }kjk iz’kkld fu;qDr fd;k x;k && f’kdk;rksa ds fo”k; esa Hkh tk¡p fd;k tkuk funsf’krA ¼iSjk 11 ls 16½

       ¼3½ lkslkbVh jftLVªhdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1973 ¼e-iz-½ && /kkjk 32 rFkk 33 && dh O;kfIr && f’k{kk lfefr ds fo:) vfu;ferrk,¡] dqizca/k rFkk fuf/k ds nqfoZfu;ksx ds fo”k; esa f’kdk;r && jftLVªkj tk¡p djus ds fy, vf/kd`r gS && izkf/kdkfj;ksa }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ && mPp U;k;ky; }kjk iz’kkld fu;qDr fd;k x;kA ¼iSjk 13 ls 16½


       

ORDER

Gangele, J. -- 1. The petitioner has filed this public interest litigation in regard to mismanagement of respondent No.4 Society and the irregularities committed by the respondent No.4 Society.

2. The petitioner pleaded in the petition that due to irregularities and mismanagement of the institution/society the future of near about 1200 students who are getting education in the college and schools run by the respondent No.4 Society is in dark. The respondent No.4 Society has not been running the institution, college and schools properly and there were complaints of financial embezzlement and irregularities. Some enquiries have been conducted by the district authorities and the allegations have been found proved. In spite of that, no action has been taken by the authorities in the matter.

3. The petitioner prayed a relief that respondents No.1 and 2 be directed to take over the respondent No.4 Society and an Administrator of the society be appointed.

4. After issuance of notice some more persons and students including the staff members filed intervention applications and their applications have been allowed.

5. J.C. Mills Education Institutions Managing Society was registered in the year 1964 under the provisions of M.P. Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam applicable at that time. It had started imparting education to the children specially workers of J.C. Mills. For the aforesaid purpose, the society had established Primary, Middle and Higher Secondary Schools. In the year 1976 J.C. Mills Girls College was established. At that time, J.C. Mills had been providing financial assistance to the society. It was declared sick and the management of J.C. Mills stopped providing financial aid to the society.

6. A public interest litigation was filed before this Court. It was registered as Writ Petition No.1280/1994 -- J.K. Bhomia v. Secretary of Government of M.P. In the aforesaid petition, the State of M.P. had agreed to provide financial aid to the Society and the Society was directed to run educational institutions. Thereafter, the State of M.P. granted aid for a period of one year. It was discontinued in the year 1995. The State had sanctioned aid to 12 teachers under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978. Subsequently, the aid was reduced to 50% in pursuance to the judgment passed by the High Court and the matter is pending before the Supreme Court.

7. As per the reply filed by the respondent No.4 Society, near about 1177 students have been enrolled in the colleges and schools run by the society in four courses and 19 subjects. There are 37 teaching staffs and 16 non-teaching staff working in the college. The society in its return pleaded that there are 389 students out of 1177 belonging to SC, ST and OBC. From the aforesaid students, the society received meager fees as per the fees structure approved by the State of M.P. and it is getting some expenses from Tribal Welfare Department. The society denied the allegations that there are any mismanagement or misappropriation of funds or any irregularity in the society. Contrary to this, it is pleaded that the society has been managing the college and other institutions properly. Numbers of the students have been increased time to time. The teachers are getting proper salary. The society also questioned the locus of the petitioner to file PIL and submitted that the petition has been filed on behalf of the teachers, who want that the college be taken over by the Government and it is a sponsored petition.

8. The respondents No.1 and 2 in their reply submitted that the Collector Gwalior had received complaint from some lecturers in regard to working of the society. On the aforesaid complaint two member committee was constituted to enquire into the allegations. The committee in its enquiry report found that there were irregularities in the working of the society and financial irregularities were also report
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top