SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 39

K.K.TRIVEDI
Suman Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Ankit Pandey for petitioner; M.P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 14.9.2012 passed in Civil Suit No.674-A/2007 by 19th Civil Judge,Class II, Bhopal allowing the application of the respondents/plaintiffs for amendment in the plaint.

2. It is contended that the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit initially for declaration and permanent injunction in mandatory form. An application for amendment was made by the respondent/plaintiff, which was contested by the petitioner. The said application was rejected vide order dated 30.6.2010. A writ petition was preferred before this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the respondents/plaintiffs challenging such order of trial Court and holding that no error was committed by the Court below in rejecting the application of the respondents/plaintiffs, the said writ petition was dismissed. Again with a malafide intention, on account of certain events, which have taken place subsequent to filing of suit, the amendment application was repeated by the respondents/plaintiffs, which was though opposed, but has been allowed by the impugned order. Therefore, this writ petition is required to be filed.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top