SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 74

M.K.MUDGAL
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
Veerendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
vk’kh”k lkjLor vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls(
Ashish Saraswat for appellant

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant/plaintiff has filed this appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28.7.2009 passed by Court of II ADJ, Morena in Civil Appeal No.8-A of 2008 affirming the judgment and decree dated 21.1.2008 passed by the Court of Civil Judge Class I, Morena in Civil Suit No.15-A of 2005 whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration of title and permanent injunction against the defendant has been dismissed. In this appeal, the appellant is referred to as “plaintiff” and the respondent as “defendant no.1”.

2. The admitted facts of the case are that the respondent No.2 State remained ex parte before the Courts below. The patta of the disputed land in the case No.25/02-03×A/19 was granted by Tahsildar on 30.6.2003 to the defendant. The said land hereinafter would be referred to as disputed land’. The appeal filed by the plaintiff against the said grant was dismissed vide order dated 31.5.2005 by SDO, Morena and the revision arising therefrom was also dismissed vide order dated 13.12.2005 by Assistant Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena.

3. The facts in brief of the case are that Gopal father of plainti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top