M.K.MUDGAL
Yogesh Vijayvargiya – Appellant
Versus
Prafull Joshi – Respondent
1. The appellants/defendants have filed this appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 5.12.2011 passed by District Judge, Guna in Civil Appeal No.29A of 2010 confirming the judgment and decree dated 3.9.2010 passed by the Court of I Civil Judge Class II, Guna in Civil Suit No.10A of 2010 whereby, the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs in representative capacity under section 91 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the appellants/defendants for restraining them from causing nuisance by playing music system DJ near the colony where the plaintiffs reside, was decreed. In this appeal, the appellants are referred to as “defendants” and the respondents as “plaintiff's'.
2. The facts in brief of the case are that the plaintiffs are residents of Mathkari Colony Guna and there exists a marriage Garden owned by the defendants namely Pawan Shree Mangalik Bhawan (which hereinafter would be referred to as “marriage garden”), where during marriage season, the DJ system is played till late in the night upto 1 AM, owing to which, public residing in the vicinity faces great problems. It has been further stated in the plain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.