SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 203

M.K.MUDGAL
Yogesh Vijayvargiya – Appellant
Versus
Prafull Joshi – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Lahoti for appellants.

ORDER

1. The appellants/defendants have filed this appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 5.12.2011 passed by District Judge, Guna in Civil Appeal No.29A of 2010 confirming the judgment and decree dated 3.9.2010 passed by the Court of I Civil Judge Class II, Guna in Civil Suit No.10A of 2010 whereby, the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs in representative capacity under section 91 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the appellants/defendants for restraining them from causing nuisance by playing music system DJ near the colony where the plaintiffs reside, was decreed. In this appeal, the appellants are referred to as “defendants” and the respondents as “plaintiff's'.

2. The facts in brief of the case are that the plaintiffs are residents of Mathkari Colony Guna and there exists a marriage Garden owned by the defendants namely Pawan Shree Mangalik Bhawan (which hereinafter would be referred to as “marriage garden”), where during marriage season, the DJ system is played till late in the night upto 1 AM, owing to which, public residing in the vicinity faces great problems. It has been further stated in the plain







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top