SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 129

SUJOY PAUL
Ramesh Pal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma for petitioner;
Anil Sharma for respondents.

ORDER

1. The petitioner, by invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution has challenged the enquiry report of Internal Complaint Committee (Probation and Redressal of Complaints against Sexual Harassment of Women in Workplace). The consequential show cause notice dated 10.12.2013 (Annexure P-7) based on enquiry report Annexure P-1 is also called in question.

2. The admitted facts between the parties are that the petitioner is an employee (substantively holding the post of Professor) in respondent No.2-Organization viz., Laxmibai National Institute of Physical Education, Gwalior. At the relevant point of time, the petitioner was working as Incharge Vice-Chancellor. In this writ petition, the respondents have filed an application for dismissal of the petition for want of jurisdiction of this Court. This application is based on the notification of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training) notification dated 31.10.2008 published in Gazette of India Extraordinary Part 3(ii). By this notification, in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (1985 Ac

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top