SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 167

B.D.RATHI
Suresh Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajmani Bansal for petitioner; Ms. Nutan Saxena, Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State.

ORDER

1. With the consent of parties matter is finally heard.

2. By invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, the instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code') seeking the relief of quashing the FIR registered at Crime No.268/2013 for the offence punishable under sections 34(1)(2) and 47A of M.P. Excise Act and also the entire subsequent criminal proceedings arising out of that crime.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner Suresh Upadhyay has been made as an accused in the present crime registered for the offence punishable under sections 34(1)(2) and 47A of M.P. Excise Act. The present offence was registered on 26th May, 2013 at about 6 pm against Shailendra Singh, Ravindra Singh and present petitioner.

4. The accusation of prosecution is that 1250 quarters country made liquor was seized from a white Scorpio Car bearing No.MP06 BA0121. It is alleged that the present petitioner was also sitting in that vehicle and during search he ran away from the spot. Name of present petitioner was disclosed by co-accused Shailendra Singh Gurjar in his memo who was arrested on the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top