SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 171

SUJOY PAUL
Gaurav Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
Girdhar Gopal Bajoriya – Respondent


Advocates:
Jitendra Sharma for applicants; S. K. Shrivastava for respondents.

ORDER

1. This application is filed by the applicant under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( for brevity “ Arbitration Act”) for appointment of sole arbitrator.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the relevant facts are that applicant and respondents No.1 and 2 signed a share holder agreement on 20.6.2012 (Annexure P/1) .The case of the applicant is that the aforesaid respondents handed over 10 cheques to the applicant on 20.6.2012. The total amount arising out of the said cheques was Rs.1,73,83,000/-. The applicant submitted these cheques before the bank, but the cheques were not honored. After certain correspondence between the parties aforesaid, applicant sent a notice on 10.2.2013 by invoking clause 40 of the said agreement. The aforesaid respondents sent their reply on 16.2.2013 and stated that they do not agree for appointment of arbitrator suggested by the applicant. After this, present application under section 11 (6) of the Arbitration Act is filed.

3. Shri Jitendra Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants, relied on clause 40 of the share holder agreement and submitted that the respondents have erred in not accepting the request for appointing of
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top