SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 114

SUJOY PAUL
Ganga Bai – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chandra Mangal – Respondent


Advocates:
Ankur Maheshwari for petitioners; N. K. Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

1. By invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 1.10.2013 passed by the executing Court in case No.32A/2004 Csx50A/2012. By this order, the application preferred by the petitioner under section 47 read with section 151 CPC is rejected.

2. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of this matter are that the respondent preferred a civil suit No.32A/2004 before Civil Judge Class-II, Jaura for eviction of the petitioner/tenant. Civil suit aforesaid, was allowed by the judgment and decree dated 24.10.2005. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree, the present petitioner preferred an appeal before the lower appellate Court bearing case No.5A/2011. The said appeal was disallowed. In other words, in civil appeal No.5A/2011 the lower Appellate Court confirmed the judgment and decree of eviction dated 24.10.2005. Petitioner/defendant then tested the judgment and decree by filing SANo.247/2012. The said SA was dismissed on 31.3.2013 by this Court. This Court granted three months time to appellants vacate the suit premises on the condition that they shall pay the rent regularly to the landlord. The petitio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top