R.S.JHA
Aklesh – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep – Respondent
1. The appellants have filed this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 3.3.2005 passed by the First Additional Judge to the Court of Second Additional District Judge, Chhindwara, in Civil Appeal No.18-A/2004 whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.4.2003 passed by the IInd Civil Judge Class-I Chhindwara in Civil Suit No.222-A/2002 has been affirmed and confirmed and the suit filed by the appellants for declaration, possession, partition and injunction has been dismissed.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that the only issue involved in the present appeal is the question of perversity of the judgment of the Courts below in appreciating and considering the document Exhibit P-4, which is a Will in favour of the appellants and the statement of the witnesses PW 2 Devrao and Shankerlal PW 3. It is submitted that these two witnesses have affirmed the execution of the Will, Exhibit P-4, and in such circumstances the Courts below have committed perversity in rejecting the claim of the appellants based on the Will.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellants, it is observed that the Courts below have extensively considered and disc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.