U.C.MAHESHWARI
Jamuna Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Balkishan – Respondent
1. The petitioner-objector has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 17.5.2013 passed by the IIIrd Additional Judge to the Court of 1st Civil Judge Class-I, Bhopal in Execution Case No.55-A/2012 whereby his application filed under section 151 CPC, to adduce the evidence through witnesses in support of his application under Order 21 rule 97 CPC pending in the aforesaid execution proceeding to resist the execution of decree, by holding that recording of such evidence is not necessary, has been dismissed.
2. Petitioner’s counsel after taking me through the petition and papers placed on record along with impugned order argued that as per procedure prescribed under the Code of Civil Procedure, on filing the objection by a third party having independent right of possession over the property in dispute to resist the execution of decree under execution passed between the decree-holder and the judgment debtor, the Court is bound to decide such objection after extending the opportunity to adduce the evidence to the parties in support of their contention and in such premise, the executing Court did not have the authority to d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.