SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 309

A.M.KHANWILKAR, AJIT SINGH
Rakesh Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Amitabh Gupta for applicants; P. K. Kaurav, Additional Advocate General for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. These anticipatory bail applications under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘the Code’) have been filed by the applicants, namely, Rakesh Gurjar, Sanjay Malviya and Dhiraj Singh Baghel, in connection with Crime No.18/2013, registered with STF Police Station.

3. The applicants first approached the Sessions Court for the same relief, who in terms of order dated 6th March, 2014, rejected each of the applications, for the following reasons :

^^vkosnd i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us bl vi-Ø-18@13 esa vU; vfHk;qDr Hkkjr flag Bkdqj dks ,e-lh-vkj-lh-Ø-1550@2014 esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 17-2-2014 dk voyac ysrs gq, rdZ fd;k gS fd Hkkjr flag Bkdqj dk izdj.k le:i gS vr% lekurk ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd Hkh vfxze izfrHkwfr dk vf/kdkjh gSA

Hkkjr flag Bkdqj ds izfrHkwfr vkns’k fnukad 17-2-2014 ds voyksdu ek= ls ;g Li”V gks tkrk gS fd Hkkjr flag dk p;u iqfyl vkj{kd HkrhZ ijh{kk esa ugha gqvk Fkk vkSj mls fu;qfDr dk YkkHk Hkh ugha feyk Fkk] tcfd vkosnd p;fur gksdj fu;qfDr dk ykHk vftZr dj ldk gSA vkosnd }kjk ijh{kk eas dh xbZ dfFkr voSèkrk dk ykHk mls vftZr gks pqdk gS vr% vkosnd dk izdj.k Hkjrflag ds izdj.k ls lkjoku :i ls fHkUu gSA

vkosnd ds fo:) vU











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top