SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 367

SUJOY PAUL
Bismilla Bee – Appellant
Versus
Arjuman Aara – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhishek Bhadoriya for petitioner;
A.V. Bhardwaj for respondents No.1 to 6.

ORDER

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 12.10.2011 passed in COS No.73-A/2011. The Court below by the impugned order allowed the application dated 28.8.2012 (Annexure P-7) which was filed by the defendants No.1 to 5 by imposing Rs.500/- as costs and permitted the said defendants to file their written statements.

Facts :

2. The petitioner instituted a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction against the respondent-defendants. It was prayed therein that the plaintiff be declared as 1/5 share holder in the suit land after partition. Permanent injunction was also prayed for to restrain the defendants from alienating the property and from making any interference in joint possession of the plaintiff over the suit land. The Court below issued notices to the defendants. Defendants entered appearance before the Court. Out of seven defendants, only defendants No.6 and 7 filed their separate written statements. It is submitted by Shri Abhishek Bhadoriya that defendants No.2 to 6 are real sisters and are represented before Court below through a common and single Advocate namely Shri L.N. Dandotiya. It is urged that said counsel i



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top