SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 377

SUJOY PAUL
Army Public School, Morar – Appellant
Versus
Ramdhan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Chetan Kanungo for petitioner;
Vivek Jain for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 31.5.2012 whereby application for amendment preferred by the petitioner-employer is rejected by the Labour Court.

2. The services of the respondent were terminated by the petitioner Army Public School. The respondent raised an industrial dispute which, in turn, was referred to the Labour Court by the State Government. The respondent filed its statement of claim before the Labour Court. In turn, the employer filed his written statement. Thereafter, when matter was at the stage of evidence, the employer filed an application under Order 6 rule 17 CPC (Annexure P-8) on 25.12.2011. It was opposed by workman by filing reply. By impugned order, the said application is rejected.

3. The Labour Court rejected the application by holding that the amendment is filed after commencement of trial and, therefore, it cannot be allowed. It is further held that if averments of amendment application are accepted, it will change the nature of the case. The present dispute is sent by M.P. Government and if amendment is accepted, the appropriate Government will be Central Government. Thus, acceptance of amendment wi
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top