SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 351

RAJENDRA MENON, ALOK VERMA
Puspendra Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Kumar Pali for appellant; Rahul Jain, Dy. Advocate General for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Calling in question tenability of an order dated 27.11.2013 passed by the writ Court in W. P. No.560/10, this appeal is filed under section 2 (i) of the

M. P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam 2005.

2. Appellant herein was working as a Panchayat Karmi and while so working, the powers of Panchayat Secretary was also conferred upon him. In accordance with the provisions of section 59 of the M. P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 on account of certain financial irregularities and acts of misconduct said to have been committed by the appellant, the Gram Panchayat passed a resolution on 24.10.2007 proposing to terminate/remove him from service. It is indicated in the resolution that the notice was given to him and as the petitioner has denied the contentions and, therefore, the resolution was passed on 24.10.2007.

3. Based on the resolution, the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat passed an order on 9.10.2009 removing the petitioner from service. It is seen that challenging the same, matter went to the Collector and the Commissioner and the same having been rejected, petitioner preferred the writ petition before this Court. The learned writ Court found th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top