S.K.GANGELE, S.K.PALO
Manish Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent
1. This review petition has been filed by the unsuccessful appellant under Order 47 rule 1 of CPC for re-calling the order dated 9.9.2009, passed by Single Bench of this Court in Misc. Appeal No. 1116/2009, whereby the aforesaid appeal, preferred by the appellant Manish Kumar Sharma against the rejection of application under Order 9 rule 13 of CPC has been rejected.
2. Brief facts just necessary for disposal of this review petition is that ;
Non-applicant No.1 Jagdish filed a claim petition under section 166 of Motor Vehicle Act claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.11,36,000/- from the applicant in this case (non-applicant No.1 (Manish Kumar Sharma) and non-applicant No.2 Kumar Pal Singh the owner and driver of the offending bus, on the ground that the applicant Jagdish was travelling as bona fide passenger in Bus bearing No.M.P.06/B.0031 on 18.4.1994. The bus owned Manish Kumar Sharma, was being driven by non-applicant No.2 Kumar Pal Singh rashly and negligently due to which it met with an accident. An FIR was lodged at Police Station, Kailaras. The applicant claimed that he sustained grievous injuries. The 1st Additional Motor Vehicle Accident Tribunal, Morena in Claim Ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.