Palo, J. -- 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment pronounced on 1st November, 2006 by the District Judge, Bhind, in Civil Suit No.10/06 (Hindu Marriage Act) by which the petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, filed by the husband/appellant was rejected, the appellant has filed this appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. Before the learned trial Court it was not disputed that appellant married the respondent on 9.5.1983 according to Hindu rites. The parents and younger and elder brothers are also residing with the appellant. It is also not disputed that before filing of the petition, an effort was made by the relatives to keep the respondent separately in the parental house of the appellant and for some time 500/- rupees per month was being given to her as maintenance by the appellant. No child is born due to the wedlock of the appellant and respondent.

3. The appellant/husband filed the petition before the learned District Judge, Bhind, on the ground that after their marriage in the year 1983, they lived together for two years. The respondent often used to visit her maternal home. She started quarrelling with the appellant and was pres