HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajendra Menon and S.K. Gangele, JJ.
Anukriti Mishra (Ku.) v. Gujrat National Law University and others
Writ Petition No.11082 of 2014 (Jabalpur); Decided on 7.1.2015
Held : In the present case the petitioner wishes to challenge the vires of enactment enacted by the State of Chhattisgarh. The petitioner has also challenged the action of the University by which she has been denied the admission in B.A., LL.B. Five Years (Hon.) Course. The University has denied the admission to the petitioner on the basis of some statutory provisions, which were enacted by the State Legislature after considering the principles of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the judgment quoted above and the concept of forum convenience as held by the Five Judges Bench of Delhi High Court. In our opinion, it would not be just and proper for this Court to entertain the writ petition on the principle of forum convenience. Consequently, the petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (2014)9 SCC 329 followed. AIR 2011 Delhi 174 relied on.
Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq-226 && ds v/khu ;kfpdk && {ks=h; vf/kdkfjrk && ;kph }kjk NŸkhlx<+ jkT; }kjk vf/kfu;fer vf/kfu;fefr dh ‘kfDreŸkrk vk{ksfir dh && fo’ofo|ky; esa izos’k nsus ds izR;k[;ku dh dkjZokbZ dks Hkh dkuwuh mica/kksa ds vk/kkj ij vk{ksfir fd;k && ;kph Ek/;izns’k jkT; dh fuoklh && U;k;ky; dh lqfo/kk ds fl)kar ds vk/kkj ij ;kfpdk xzg.k djuk Bhd rFkk mfpr ugha && ;kfpdk [kkfjtA vfHkfu/kkZfjr % orZeku ekeys esa ;kph NŸkhlx<+ jkT; }kjk vf/kfu;fer vf/kfu;fefr dh ‘kfDreŸkrk dks vk{ksfir djuk pkgrh gSA ;kph us fo’ofo|ky; dh dkjZokbZ dks Hkh vk{ksfir fd;k gS ftlds }kjk mls ch-,-] ,y-,y-ch- ik¡p o”khZ; ¼vkWuLkZ½ dkslZ es izos’k nsus ls izR;k[;ku fd;k gSA fo’ofo|ky; us dkuwuh mica/kks ds vk/kkj ij izos’k nsus ls izR;k[;ku fd;k gS tks fd jkT; fo/kku&eaM+y }kjk mijksDr mRdfFkr fu.kZ; es ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kdfFkr fof/k ds fl)karaks rFkk U;k;ky; dh lqfo/kkvksa dh ladYiuk tSlk fd fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; ds ik¡p U;k;k/kh’kksa dh ihB }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k] ij fopkj djus ds ckn vf/kfu;fer fd, x, FksA gekjh jk; esa U;k;ky; dh lqfo/kk ds fl)kar ds vk/kkj ij bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;kfpdk xzg.k djuk Bhd rFkk mfpr ugh gksxkA ifj.kker% ;kph }kjk izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA ¼2014½9 ,l lh lh 329 vuqlfjrA , vkb vkj 2011 fnYyh 174 voyafcrA ¼iSjk 10
Gangele, J. -- 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that she was selected in the test named as B.A., LL.B (Hon.) Admission Test of 2014 for Five Years Law Degree Course. However she was not given admission in the college. By way of the amendment, the petitioner has also sought quashment of the provision of eligibility criteria contained in the Information Brochure, (Annexure R-1) for dependents of freedom fighters on the basis of residents or domicile in the State of Chhattisgarh.
2. The respondent No.1, Gujarat National Law University Gandhinagar had conducted a Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) for admission for five years B.A., LL.B (Hon.) Course for seventeen National Law Universities. The petitioner appeared in the examination. She was placed at Sl.No.3102 rank because she had got marks 107.75. The petitioner had received an e-mail massage to the effect that “her candidature has been selected for the first exercise of counselling process”. She was directed to log in account and do the needful. The petitioner was allotted Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur. She was placed at Sl.No.95 in the selected candidates of that college. The respondent No.4 was placed at Sl.No. 129 and respondent No.5 was placed at Sl. No.147. They received 61.75 marks and 32.25 marks.
3. When the petitioner reached at Raipur to get admission, she received a phone call from Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar and received information that it was not necessary for her to appear in the interview because her name has been deleted. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that she was eligible to get admission under the quota of Freedom Fighters and the same has been denied to her illegally.
4. The respondents No.1, 2, 3 and 5 in their reply pleaded that Gujrat Law University conducted the Enterance Examination for admission to Under Graduates and Post Graduates Degree Programme for fourteen participants National Law Universities. There is no reservation in other Universities to the dependents of freedom fighters except at Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur. In accordance with the enactment, Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur has made provision of reservation to the dependents of freedom fighters belonging to the State of Chhattisgarh only. It means that the freedom fighters must be a resident of Chhattisgarh and the candidates belonging to the category of dependents of Freedom Fighters are eligible to get admission if the freedom fighter is resident of Chhattisgarh State. Because the grand father of the petitioner Shri Sheetal Prasad Mishra was not freedom fighter belonging to the State of Chhattisgarh, hence the petitioner is not eligible to get admission. Along with the reply, the respondents also filed an application for dismissal of the writ petition. It is pleaded in the application that this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
5. There is reservation to the candidates in Common Law Admission Test (CLAT). It is divided in two categories. The first category is under the heading of All India Seats and second category is under the heading of Chhattisgarh domicile seat. It is clear from the Information Brochure, copy of which has been filed as Annexure R-1 alongwith the return following is the eligibility criteria for admission in Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur in accordance with the brochure :
“Candidates who are appearing or have appeared in the 10+2 examination and are awaiting results are also eligible to appear in the test. However, such candidates are required to have passed the qualifying examination at the time of their admission and must be able to submit the proofs of their claims.
Category All India Seats
Open Female Total (30%)
SC (15%) 8 4 12
ST (7, 5%) 4 2 6
Persons with disabilities 1 1 2 (PWD) (3%)
Unreserved 42 18 60
Total 55 25 80
Category Chhattisgarh State Domicile Seats
Open Fem
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.