SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 37

K.K.TRIVEDI
Jhariyari – Appellant
Versus
Satya Narayan Kewat – Respondent


Advocates:
V. N. Shukla for appellants.

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal by the defendants under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is essentially against the judgment and decree dated 30.7.2005 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.142-A/2004 of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Rewa arising out of judgment and decree dated 29.10.2004 passed in Civil Suit No.122-A/2004 by the Civil Judge, Class II, Teonthar, district Rewa.

2. The respondents/plaintiffs approached the Civil Court by filing a suit seeking declaration of their title and permanent injunction against the appellants/defendants. It was contended that the land in suit belonged to the respondents/plaintiffs and they have a share to the extent indicated in the plaint. It was contended in the suit that the appellants/defendants had no right over the said property, but they have tried to dispossess the respondents/plaintiffs by making illegal encroachment on the land. The suit was contested by the appellants and in fact a counter claim was filed stating that at no point of time any Will was executed in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs. It was contended that in fact the Will was never set out and, therefore, the respondents were not entitled to any reli








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top