SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 655

SANJAY YADAV
Swantra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ramprasad (d) through LRs. Gita Bai – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard on admission.

2. This is plaintiff’s second appeal directed against judgment and decree dated 24.1.2004 in Civil Appeal No.16 A/2000 passed by Additional District Judge, Sohagpur affirming the judgment and decree dated 12.5.2000 passed in Civil Suit No.11 A/1996 by Civil Judge Class I, Piparia.

3. Plaintiff having failed to establish that suit property marked as ABCD in the plaint map was the joint family property led the trial Court non suit the plaintiff in a suit for partition, declaration of title and for permanent injunction on a finding that the suit property was purchased by defendant vide registered saledeed on 25.8.1940.

4. The trial Court found -

^^17- izfroknh us vius okn mÙkj esa crk;k gS fd oknxzLr edku mlus Lo;a ds iSlksa ls [kjhnk gS vkSj mDr IykV lu~ 1940 esa [kjhndj mldk fuekZ.k fd;k gSA vkSj dCtk izkIr fd;k gS mDr okn fo”k; ds laca/k esa dFku gsrq izfroknh Lo;a mifLFkr ugha gqvk gS u gh mlus dksbZ izek.k is’k fd;kA izdj.k esa izLrqr nLrkostksa ls ;g Li”V gS fd oknxzLr edku izfroknh ds uke gS rFkk ;g Hkh Li”V gS fd og IykV [kjhnrs le; fefyVªh dh ukSdjh esa Fkk tcfd okn fo”k; Øa-1 esa fujkdj.k esa oknh ;g fl) ugha dj ldk fd mDr edku iSf=d laifÙk dk Fkk]





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top