ROHIT ARYA
Kamlesh Baghel – Appellant
Versus
Shrikrishan Yadav – Respondent
1. By this revision petition under section 115 CPC., challenge is made to an interlocutory order dated 20.11.2014 passed in MJC No.24/2014 by District Judge, Vidisha. By the aforesaid order, an application filed by the revisionist under section 24 CPC has been rejected.
2. Facts necessary for disposal of this revision petition are to the effect that one Civil Suit No.20A/203 has been filed by the applicant, Kamlesh Baghel against Smt. Sharda Devi Tandon before II Additional District Judge, Vidisha seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell the suit property and for declaration that the sale deed executed by Smt. Sharda Devi Tandon in favour of Shrikrishna Yadav be declared null and void. Another suit bearing No.11A/2012 has been filed by Shrikrishna Yadav v. Kamlesh Baghel and others for eviction and arrears of rent, under the Rent Control Act, which is pending before the Court of III Civil Judge, ClassI, Vidisha.
3. The applicant/revisionist advanced submissions before the District Judge that both the suits be clubbed together for analogous hearing to avoid conflicting decisions. The application was dismissed by the impugned order on the premise that the former suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.