1. This revision under section 397 read with section 401 of CrPC is directed against the order dated 8.1.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Mandsaur in Sessions Trial No.101/2010, by which, the learned Additional Sessions Judge decided juvenility of the present petitioners Rakesh, Himmat and Vinod and gave a finding that the present petitioners were more than 18 years of age on the date of occurrence which was 5.3.2010.

2. The facts giving rise to this application are that the learned Special Judge by the impugned order decided the application filed by the present petitioners and while deciding the application, the learned ASJ gave an inference that they were above 18 years of age at the time of incident.

3. The present revision is filed on the ground that the present petitioner is entitled to the provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and the procedure is led down in rule 12 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007. According to the counsel for the petitioner, age of the petitioner was not computed according to the provision of Rule 12 of the rule and the procedure led down by the Rules was not followed by the