SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 241

S.R.WAGHMARE
Himmat Singh – Appellant
Versus
CBN through Ashish Chakrawarti – Respondent


Advocates:
N. J. Dave for petitioner; Manoj Soni Government Advocate for respondent/CBI.

ORDER

1. By this application under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioner Himmat Singh has challenged the order dated 10.11.2014 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Act, Mandsaur District, Mandsaur in S.T.No.

22/2014 dismissing the application filed under sections 91, 92 of the CrPC read with section 65(b) of the Evidence Act.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case in nutshell are that Himmat Singh was being prosecuted for evidence under sections 8/18, 25, 29 of the NDPS Act. He was in custody. He moved the application under sections 91 and 92 of the CrPC read with section 65(b) of the Evidence Act. Counsel submitted that since the call details of the officers who were raiding party were to be preserved, the application was, however, dismissed by the trial Court and hence the present petition. Counsel submitted that call details were of utmost importance to the defence of the accused since they had abducted the present applicant snatched his mobile and dropped him at the barrier of the M.P. border and had taken his vehicle also. They had taken him to the State of Rajasthan initially and all the details were available on the mobile telephone numbers which are supplie










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top