SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 186

S.K.PALO
Prashant Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ankur Mody for petitioner; Mukund Bhardwaj, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This revision under section 397/401 of CrPC has been filed challenging the order dated 19.2.2013 passed by the 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior, in Sessions Trial No.101/13 whereby charges under section 304B in alternative 302 in alternative 306 and under section 498A of IPC has been framed against the petitioner/accused.

2. It is alleged that deceased Amrita Agrawal, wife of Tarun Agrawal, aged 25 years died on 6.9.2012 in suspicious circumstances by hanging. Therefore, offence under section 304B read with section 34 of IPC was registered against her mother-in-law, two sisters-in-law and the applicant,the husband of the sister-in-law of the deceased.

3. During investigation it was found that the accused persons demanded two lacs rupees as dowry and were harassing the deceased. Husband of the deceased was in the habit of taking alcohol. His mother Shobha Agrawal, sister Chanda and petitioner Prashant repeatedly ‘taunting’ the deceased for she did not bring sufficient dowry. On their instigation her husband Tarun Agrawal used to commit cruelty with the deceased. On 26.9.2012, deceased was harassed by her husband, brother-in-law, sisters-in-law and the applicant. She was
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top