SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 272

ROHIT ARYA
Majid Khan – Appellant
Versus
Anita Kalyan – Respondent


Advocates:
Anand Kumar Gupta for petitioner.

ORDER

1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the confirming order of the revisional Court dated 18.6.2015 in Criminal Revision No.90/2015. The trial Court has rejected the application filed by the revisionist/accused vide order dated 9.4.2015 for transfer of Criminal Case No.448/2010 to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chachoda, District Guna (Shri Girraj Prasad Garg) in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court, reported in (2014)9 SCC 129, Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra and another.

2. Facts necessary for disposal of this petition are to the effect that the respondent/complainant has filed a criminal complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the NI Act) on 6.7.2010 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chachoda, District Guna (Shri Girraj Prasad Garg). It appears that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Guna vide administrative order No.Q/11 dated 19.7.2011 had transferred number of cases from the Court of Shri Girraj Prasad Garg, Judicial Magistrate, First






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top