ROHIT ARYA
Majid Khan – Appellant
Versus
Anita Kalyan – Respondent
1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the confirming order of the revisional Court dated 18.6.2015 in Criminal Revision No.90/2015. The trial Court has rejected the application filed by the revisionist/accused vide order dated 9.4.2015 for transfer of Criminal Case No.448/2010 to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chachoda, District Guna (Shri Girraj Prasad Garg) in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court, reported in (2014)9 SCC 129, Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra and another.
2. Facts necessary for disposal of this petition are to the effect that the respondent/complainant has filed a criminal complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the NI Act) on 6.7.2010 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chachoda, District Guna (Shri Girraj Prasad Garg). It appears that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Guna vide administrative order No.Q/11 dated 19.7.2011 had transferred number of cases from the Court of Shri Girraj Prasad Garg, Judicial Magistrate, First
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.