SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 160

SUJOY PAUL
Rajesh Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Ram Vilas Singh Kushwaha – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K. Shukla for petitioner;
Harish Dixit for respondent.

ORDER :

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution takes exception to the order passed by the trial Court dated 20.12.2013 whereby the application of the present petitioner-defendant preferred under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 was rejected by the trial Court. The order passed in Miscellaneous Appeals No. 4/14 and 9/14 is also called in question whereby the lower appellate Court in exercise of power under Order 43 rule 1 CPC passed injunction in favour of the respondent-plaintiff.

2. The necessary facts for adjudication of this order are that the respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction (Annexure P-3). Along with the said suit, he filed an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 CPC (Annexure P-4). The present petitioner therein filed his counter-claim and application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 (Annexure P-5). In the said counter-claim, he also prayed for grant of injunction. The trial Court heard the parties and passed the order dated 20.12.2013 (Annexure P-2).

3. Shri H.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the property in question is situated at survey No. 1976, Gram Gospura. The said property is recorded in the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top