SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 215

SHEEL NAGU, B.D.RATHI
Avadhesh Singh Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Anil Mishra for petitioners;
R.P. Rathi, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER :

Rathi, J. -- 1. This writ petition in the style of Pro Bono Publico has been filed by the petitioners, claiming following reliefs :

“1. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to 8 not to seek search warrants under section 93 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the purposes of search and seizure for investigation of registered offence under the P.C. Act, 1988 and other various Acts.

2. The competent Special Courts notified under the P.C. Act, 1988, be also directed not to issue Search warrants to the respondents for the routine course search and seizure for the investigation of Offences registered under the P.C. Act and other various Acts.

3. Furthermore the respondents be directed to strictly comply with the provisions as contained under section 165 and section 166 of Code of Criminal procedure and other relevant sections enacted for the purpose of Search and Seizure for investigation of Offences registered under the P.C. Act 1988 and other various Acts.

4. That, any other suitable and proper relief that this Hon’ble Court deems fit for doing justice in the matter may be granted.”

2. In support of the petition, it is submitted by Shri Mishra, le

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top