SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 1041

S.C.SHARMA
Abhilasha Residential Society – Appellant
Versus
Indore Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Phadke, S. R. Saraf

JUDGMENT : 

Regard being had to the homogeneous character of the controversy involved in the present cases, writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being decided by this Court, Facts of Writ Petition No. 8494/2009 are narrated hereunder-

2. The petitioner before this Court, a society registered under the provisions of the M. P. Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973, has filed this present petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, to the respondents, directing them to remove the illegal construction made in the premises of Abhilasha Apartment and to provide 3000 sq. ft. covered parking area to the flat owners of the building.

3. The petitioner society is a society of flat owners who have purchased flats in a building known as Abhilasha Apartment situated at 585/2 M. G. Road, Iridore, constructed by respondent No. 2 M/s Kalpa-Taru Builders. The contention of the" petitioner society is that a map was sanctioned by respondent No. 1/Municipal Corporation, Indore in respect of Abhilasha Apartment and the ground floor of Abhilasha Apartment as per the sanctioned map was covered parking area.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner society h






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top