K.K.LAHOTI, VIMLA JAIN
Akanksha Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shri D. K. Tripathi, counsel for petitioner. Shri Harish Agnihotri, G. A., for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri Vivek Mourya, counsel for respondent No. 4. The petitioner has sought following reliefs in this petition: -"(1) To call for entire relevant record.
[1(a)] To declare the section 8 of the Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavasayik Shikshan Sansthan (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007, Act No. 21 of 2007" is unconstitutional. [2] To declare the Rule 9 of the Madhya Pradesh Private Medical and Dental Undergraduate Entrance Examination Rules, 2009 is unconstitutional.
[3] To direct the respondents to permit the petitioner as open + freedom fighter category in the counselling and the same allot a seat of M.B.B.S., in any private medical college.
[4] To pass such any other order as deem fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.
[5] Any other relief together cost of the petition which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of this case may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner."
2. The facts of the case are that petitioner applied for M.B.B.S. Course in private medical college. The admission is governed by the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.