SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 1063

ANIL SHARMA
Yogendra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Renu Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Prashant Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V.D. Sharma and A.R. Shivhare, Advocates.

JUDGMENT : 

Anil Sharma, J.

1 Petitioner has filed this revision petition under Section 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the order dated 30.7.09 passed by learned Second Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.181/09 whereby the sentence of 6 months' imprisonment and payment of Rs.35,000 compensation for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act has been modified to RI for 1 month and fine of Rs.1,50,000, out of which Rs.1,30,000 have to be paid as compensation and Rs.20,000 as fine.

2 The brief facts of the case in narrow compass are that the complainant/respondent Smt. Renu Agrawal has extended the loan facility of Rs.1,00,000 to the firm Gangaram Bhagwandas which is a partnership firm of which petitioner/accused is partner alongwith Omprakash Gupta. Smt. Indu Gupta and Smt. Mamta Gupta for repayment of said loan amount cheque No.020333 of Rs.1,00,000 dated 23.12.05 was issued by the petitioner/ accused to the respondent/' complainant.

3 The cheque issued by petitioner/accused was returned by the Bank alongwith the note that cheque could not be honoured because of "death of partner". Thereafter, the complainant has issued the notic





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top