SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(MP) 962

S.N.AGGARWAL
Sagar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dharmendra Garg, Advocate., For the Respondent/State: Mr. Vishal Mishra, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

S.N. Aggarwal, J. -

This appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the appellant is directed against his conviction under Sec­tions 376(1) and 373 IPC vide impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 14.8.2006 in Sessions Trial Case No. 59/04. The ap­pellant has been sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years for offence under Section 376(1) IPC and 7 years for offence under Section 373 IPC and fine with default stipu­lation.

2. I have heard the arguments of Mr. Dharmendra Garg, learned counsel appear­ing on behalf of the appellant and also of Mr. Vishal Mishra, learned Public Prosecu­tor appearing on behalf of the respondent/State. I have also perused the record of the Trial Court.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case giving rise to this appeal are as follows:-

There were seven persons implicated as accused persons by the prosecution in crime No. 298/03 registered at Police Station Jamner, District Guna. The appellant was one of them. Initially the crime was regis­tered against the unknown persons on the basis of 'merg report' of the mother of the prosecutrix. The case was registered under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top