MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT JABALBUR BENCH
Ajit Singh, Sanjay Yadav, JJ.
Pichada Avam Dalit Warg Sangh - Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. & Ors. - Respondent
W.P. No. 8283 of 2009
Decided On : 12-01-2012
Reservation - Applicability of Adhiniyam 1994 - Section 3, Section 4 - The court discussed the applicability of the Madhya Pradesh Lok Sewa (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994 to the appointments of Anganwadi workers and helpers. It highlighted the definition of 'establishment' under Section 2(b) and the reservation provisions under Section 4, emphasizing that the Adhiniyam is applicable to establishments with posts and that reservation is for direct recruitment in public services and posts. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in State of Karnataka v. Ameerbi to conclude that Anganwadi workers and helpers are not holders of posts and therefore the provisions of the Adhiniyam 1994 are not applicable to them.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a society registered under the Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhinivam, filed a public interest litigation to direct the implementation of reservation provisions for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other Backward Classes in the appointments of Anganwadi workers and helpers.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the provisions of the Adhiniyam 1994 are not applicable to Anganwadi workers and helpers as they are not holders of any posts, based on the Supreme Court's decision in State of Karnataka v. Ameerbi.
Issues: The main issue was the applicability of the reservation provisions of the Adhiniyam 1994 to the appointments of Anganwadi workers and helpers.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the definition of 'establishment' and the reservation provisions under the Adhiniyam 1994, as well as the Supreme Court's ruling that Anganwadi workers and helpers are not holders of posts.
Final Decision: The petition was found to have no merit and was accordingly dismissed.
Judgment
Ajit Singh, J.-
The petitioner is a society registered under the Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhinivam. 1973. Its one of the objects is to uplift the members of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes. By this petition, filed as public interest litigation, it has prayed that the respondents be directed to implement the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Lok Sewa (Anusuchit Jatiyon, Anusuchit Jan Jatiyon Aur Anya Pichhade Vargon Ke Liye Arakshan) Adhiniyam, 1994 (in short, "the Adhiniyam, 1994) in the appointments of Anganwadi workers and helpers.
2. On 3.8.2009, Department of Women and Child Development of the State Government published an advertisement for filling up the vacancies in different districts of Anganwadi workers and helpers. The grievance of petitioner is that, except for providing provision for giving additional marks to the candidates of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, no provision for the reservation of vacancies for them has been made which is illegal and contrary to the Adhiniyam, 1994.
3. In reply, the State Government has justified its action of not providing reservation for the vacancies in favour of the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes on the ground that the Anganwadi workers and helpers are not holders of posts. The State Government has also placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in State of Karnataka v. Ameerbi (2007) 11 SCC 681.
4. The Adhiniyam 1994 has been enacted by the State Government. Its long title states that it is an Act to provide for the reservation of vacancies in public services and posts in favour of the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes of citizens and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Section 3 of the Adhiniyam makes it applicable to the establishment as defined therein. Establishment is defined in section 2(b) which reads as under:
"2(b) "Establishment" means any office of the State Government or of a local authority or statutory authority constituted under any Act of the State for the time being in force, or a University or a company, corporation or a cooperative society in which not less than fiftyone percent of the paid up share capital is held by the State Government or the institutions receiving grant-in-aid or any cash grant from the State Government and includes a work charge or contingency paid establishments and such establishments in which casual appointments are made but does not include the establishments covered under Article 30 of the Constitution."
5. Section 4 of the Adhiniyam 1994 provides for the fixation of percentage for reservation of posts and standard of evaluation. The relevant extract of the section reads as under:
"4. Fixation of percentage for reservation of posts and standard of evaluation. (1) Unless otherwise provided by or under this Act, the posts reserved for the members of Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or other Backward Classes shall not be filled by the members who do not belong to such castes or tribes or classes, as the case may be.
2) Subject to other provisions of this Act there shall be reservation? for the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes, at the stage of direct recruitment in public services and posts.
(i) at the State level, the following percentage of vacancies arising in a recruitment year, in Classes I, II, III and IV posts
(a) In Class I and Class II posts
Scheduled Castes 16 percent Scheduled Tribes 20 percent Other Backward Classes 14 percent
(b) Class III and Class IV posts
Scheduled Castes 16 percent Scheduled Tribes 20 percent Other Backward Classes 14 percent
(ii) in an establishment at the Divisional or District level the percentage of vacancies arising in a Recruitment Year in such categories of Class III and Class IV posts, as may be notified by the State Government in this behalf.
(iii) the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.