Back
S.C.SHARMA
Shankar S/o Bhima Kulmi – Appellant
Versus
Motilal S/o Shankar Kulmi – Respondent
Judgment
The present first appeal has been preferred by the defendants before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 16-1-11996 passed by Additional District Judge, Dhar in Civil Suit No. 7-A/85 (Motilal and two others vs. Shankar s/o Bheema Kulmi and seven others).
2. In the present case, a suit for partition, separate possession and mesne profits was filed by the plaintiffs Motilal, Kalu and Devkunwerbai. The genealogy of the parties of the suit is as under :-
| Shankar (Defendant No. 1/appellant No. 1) | Rukhmabai (wife) (Defendant No. 2/appellant No. 2) | |||
| Devkunwerbai (wife) Plaintiff No. 3/respondent No. 3 | ||||
| Motilal (plaintiff No. 1/respondent No. 1) | Kalu (plaintiff No. 2/respondent No. 2) | |||
| Ghanshyam Deft. No. 3/Apt. No. 3 | Kailash Deft. No. 4/Apt. No. 4 | Jagdish Deft. No. 5/Apt. No. 5 | Rupchand Deft. No. 6/Apt. No. 6 | Kamal Deft. No. 7/Apt. No. 7 |
3. A suit was filed by the plaintiffs on 12-5-1978 claiming themselves to be an indigent persons and a trial Court vide order dated 5-10-1981 permitted the plaintiffs to prosecute a suit as indigent persons. A written statement was preferred by the defendants and the plain averments were denied. Various a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
