R.C.MISHRA
Khusiram Awasthy – Appellant
Versus
Sahab Singh – Respondent
This revision, under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code'), has been preferred against the order dated 5-4-2011 passed by 12th Addl. Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 11/2010, affirming the order dated 12-7-2006 passed by 3rd Civil Judge Class I, in Execution Case No. 229-A/94.
2. By the order dated 12-7-2006 (supra), the objection raised by the petitioner, under Order 21, Rule 97 read with section 105 of the Code, against execution of decree dated 24-10-1994 passed by Civil Judge Class I in Civil Suit No. 229-A/94 in favour of respondent No. 1, Sahab Singh (for short 'R1') and against the respondent No. 2, Beni Prasad (hereinafter referred to as 'R2'), was rejected. It was a decree for specific performance of a contract for sale of suit land whereas the objection was raised inter alia on the ground that the petitioner had been in a lawful possession thereof since 1979.
3. At the outset, it may be pointed out that the petitioner had preferred a second appeal contending that there was a mistake on the part of the Counsel to prefer an appeal, under Order 43, Rule 1(ja) of the Code, against the order dated 12-7-2006 and on the part of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.