SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(MP) 967

S.K.SETH
Day Aram – Appellant
Versus
Puniya – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

This petition is directed against the Order dated 21-5-2010 passed by the First Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Dhar in Misc.Civil Appeal No.08 of 2010.By the Order impugned Court below has set aside the ex parte judgment and decree and directed the trial Court to decide the Civil Suit No.3A/2002 on merit.

2.Facts giving rise to the petition, in a nut-shell are as under. Petitioners are the plaintiffs. They filed a suit for permanent injunction against respondents. Suit was decreed ex parte on 31-1-2003.On 2-5-2003, respondents applied under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code for recall of the ex parte judgment and decree.It was registered as MJC No.2/03.Said MJC was dismissed by the trial Court on 5-7-2004 in default of appearance. Respondents, therefore, applied for restoration of said MJC.This application was registered as MJC No.22/2005.Trial Court vide Order dated 13-11-2009 dismissed the MJC No.22/2005.The Order was challenged in Misc.Appeal No.8 of 2010 which was allowed by the Order impugned as stated above. Hence this petition.

3.We have heard rival submissions of counsel at length. Perused the material placed on record. It is true that


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top