RAKESH SAKSENA, T.K.KAUSHAL
In reference Received from: Presiding Officer,Children's Court & Sessions Judge, East-Nimar Khandwa (M. P. ) – Appellant
Versus
Vinod S/o Kishanlal Gawli – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rakesh Saksena, J.
Sessions Judge, East-Nimar, Khandwa acting under section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short the 'Code') has made this reference under the following circumstances:- Judicial Magistrate First Class, Harsud, East-Nimar, Khandwa has committed Criminal Case No.657/2011 to the Court of Session considering the case as one relating to offences against child in view (2) Cr.Ref.No.1/2012 of the Government of Madhya Pradesh Gazette Notification No. FA 17(E)/38/2010/21-B(One) dated 7th January, 2011 made in exercise of its power conferred under section 25 of the “Commission for Protection of Child Right Act, 2005” ( for short the 'Act'). Learned Magistrate in committal order has stated that since the offences under sections 279, 337, 338, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act were committed against the complainant who was of 16 years of age 'i.e. a Child', these offences ought to have been tried by the Sessions Court which was specified as Children's Court for the purpose of speedy trial of the offences against the children. Observing that the 'Act' is silent on various important points relating to the trial of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.