SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1237

K.K.TRIVEDI
Narendra Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Malti Dadariya
For the Respondents:Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

K.K. Trivedi, J.:-

The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is that he has completed 33 years of qualifying service, but the same is not being counted for the purposes of grant of pensionary benefits to the petitioner nor revision of pay of the petitioner has been done in appropriate manner, therefore, he is required to approach this Court by way of filing the present petition. It is contended that initially the petitioner was selected for his appointment as a Deputy Teacher and an order of appointment was issued on 9-11-1973. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner gave his joining, which was accepted. The petitioner discharged his duties continuously, but was paid a fixed salary of Rs. 100/- per month. Later on, the petitioner was given the benefit of regularization, but not with retrospective effect, which has resulted in not granting him the benefit of kramonnati pay scale timely. This is how the petitioner was put to financial loss while he was in service. After the retirement, the petitioner's salary has not been revised properly. As a result, he has suffered financial loss in the matter of grant of retiral dues. A legal notice was issued by the petitioner t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top